🍰✨

Salon of the Venuses

On Sunday, I sat on the bench in Gallery 811 of The Met and communed with the atmosphere created by Cabanel’s The Birth of Venus. From afar, Venus looks like she may be asleep, but under the shadowy crook of her arm, her eyes are very much open and narrowed at the viewer. I enjoyed watching patrons, upon passing by her, do a double-take, slow to a stop, and inevitably pull out their phone to capture her. Observing the passersby as part of the artwork, I made penetrating eye contact with certain individuals as they broke their gaze from the painting. Their perception upon realizing they had just been perceived was jarring for us both—I’ve come to really love the highly discomfited shock of meeting a stranger’s eyes.

I feel drawn to this vantage point again and again, as it helps me get a read on the quality of my psychosexual energy that I’m putting out into the world. I was last here in June, on the cusp of the first truly brutal NYC heat wave, steeling myself against a week without air conditioning, under the deep influence of lustful misery. Perhaps I had been here inadvertently trying to seek council or solace from Venus herself.

In June, I sat here and sobbed. On the last day of August, I made several men jump… just by looking at them.

Lately, I notice a new Rodin every time I’m at the Met. This one is Pygmalion and Galatea. From the exhibition copy:

According to classical mythology, the sculptor Pygmalion so desired a marble woman he had carved that Venus, the goddess of love, granted her life. Rodin depicts the statue of Galatea quickening at the sculptor’s touch, her glowing body emerging from unfinished stone. Yet this Pygmalion is not the handsome youth of tradition, but rather a stocky, bearded man resembling Rodin, whose name is prominently inscribed next to the mythical sculptor’s on the side of the base. In his quest to endow his figures with living force, Rodin regarded himself as a modern Pygmalion.

At this point, a guard announced to the room that the museum would be closing in 15 minutes. Feeling that I was in a bit of an art trance that I wished to prolong (which would not be possible if I were jostled amongst the rush, noise, and confusion of the departing crowd), I asked him what the most direct way to exit would be. By way of answering, he beckoned me across the gallery, unhooked a velvet-rope partition in front of an elevator, and escorted me down to the lower-level members’ entrance. I thanked him and walked back into the 5 p.m. sunshine.

Scenes from a highly memorable Saturday in August

When the thing you almost paid $$$ for (the complete archive of John Willie’s Bizarre Magazine) turns out to be free on the Internet Archive.

The guy who did my phone upgrade was very interested in why I had a parabola on my home screen.

I missed this news when it came out in February 2024. British company Tate & Lyle Sugars formerly had the oldest branding in existence, unchanged since 1885.

Their products’ biblically inspired logo depicted a dead lion swarmed with bees and the tagline, “Out of the strong came forth sweetness.” It alludes to the Old Testament story of Samson who killed a lion with his bare hands and later found a beehive inside the carcass, dripping with honey.

In 2024, Tate & Lyle Sugars updated the design with a far more anodyne image of a (seemingly alive) lion’s head with a single bee hidden in its mane. The quote was also removed.

“We’re confident that the fresh new design will make it easier for consumers to discover Lyle’s as an affordable, everyday treat while reestablishing the brand as the go-to syrup brand for the modern UK family,” said brand director James Whiteley.

“This man wasn’t in love with me. He wasn’t in love with anybody, it seemed. Though, in conversation, I would find out that the other women he saw wondered if that was a decision he made, rather than a feeling he didn’t have. His tendency was to lean toward the taken, and even when he saw women who were by any definition available, he preferred to speak about feeling second to their lives. One night at his house, he talked about how it felt to be so intimately involved with this collection of women who returned home to their husbands in the morning. In the moment, I listened and said I was sorry. Many months later, I wondered what it meant that he viewed us as a collection.”

—No Fault: A Memoir of Romance and Divorce, Haley Mlotek